Lemming v. State

Following a jury trial, Steve John Lemming appeals his conviction of two counts of aggravated assault1 and one count of criminal attempt to commit armed robbery,2 contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel.3 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Lemming maintains that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The standard of review is well settled.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, *123and the…