Demarco v. Gober
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MÓUTON, J.
A mule valued at $125 ran into an automobile, which Gober, defendant, was driving on the highway between Hammond and Pon-chatoula. In the collision, the mule was killed.
Plaintiff, owner of the mule, sued defendant for its value, who reconvened, claiming damages for injury to the auto he was driving, and for personal injuries.
The demand of plaintiff was rejected, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for $98 on his reconventional demand.
Plaintiff appeals, and, as usual, defendant is asking for an increase in the amount allowed him in reeonvention.
Defendant was traveling at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bentz v. PageSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Damonte v. PattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Martinez v. BernhardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Martin v. CazedessusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Shawhan v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennyan v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
- Abraham v. CastilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Dunckelman v. ShockleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- White v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Thigpen v. StockmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.