Legal Opinion

Moen v. Moen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

This is an action for divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, sec. 247.07 (5), Stats. The only witnesses in the case were sworn on behalf of plaintiff, as defendant did not put in an answer, although she appeared by an attorney.

Plaintiff, Claire T. Moen, a minor, and defendant, Ruth Moen, were married on the 14th day of May, 1945, while plaintiff was home on leave from the navy. They spent a three-day honeymoon in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and on their return to Eau Claire they lived together two or three days at the home of defendant’s mother. Defendant wanted the plaintiff to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bird v. BirdWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. HeffernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mentzel v. MentzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lasnicka v. LasnickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API