Legal Opinion

Progressive American Insurance Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2017No. 3D15-1067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScales, J.

Appellant, defendant below, Progressive American Insurance Company (“Progressive”), appeals a final summary judgment of the Miami-Dade County Court that both (i) declared a portion of Florida’s PIP statute unconstitutional as applied to chiropractors; and (ii) determined that, in the absence of an “emergency medical condition” diagnosis, Florida’s PIP statute allows an insured to recover up to $10,000 in PIP benefits. The county court certified the constitutional issue to us as a question of great public importance. We accepted jurisdiction, 1 and we reverse the county court’s final summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Hechtman v. Nations Title Ins. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Duncan v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A&M Gerber Chiropractic LLC v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. AA Suncoast Chiropractic Clinic, P.A. v. Progressive American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. A&M Gerber Chiropractic LLC v. Geico General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API