Progressive American Insurance Co. v. Eduardo J. Garrido D.C. P.A., Etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtScales, J.
Appellant, defendant below, Progressive American Insurance Company (“Progressive”), appeals a final summary judgment of the Miami-Dade County Court that both (i) declared a portion of Florida’s PIP statute unconstitutional as applied to chiropractors; and (ii) determined that, in the absence of an “emergency medical condition” diagnosis, Florida’s PIP statute allows an insured to recover up to $10,000 in PIP benefits. The county court certified the constitutional issue to us as a question of great public importance. We accepted jurisdiction, 1 and we reverse the county court’s final summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Hechtman v. Nations Title Ins. of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Duncan v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A&M Gerber Chiropractic LLC v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- AA Suncoast Chiropractic Clinic, P.A. v. Progressive American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- A&M Gerber Chiropractic LLC v. Geico General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019