Legal Opinion

Schmuhl v. Clarke

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 14, 2023No. 1211114Published

1Opinion of the Court

PRESENT: Goodwyn, C.J., Powell, Kelsey, McCullough, and Russell, JJ., and Millette and Mims, S.JJ. ANDREW SCHMUHL OPINION BY v. Record No. 211114 JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL DECEMBER 14, 2023 HAROLD CLARKE, DIRECTOR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Randy I. Bellows, Judge Andrew Schmuhl (“Schmuhl”) appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective due to an alleged misunderstanding of the law regarding the admissibility of mental state evidence which resulted in his inability to present crucial expert testimony…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API