Legal Opinion

George G. Fetter Co. v. Coggeshall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 5, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the’ Court by

Judge Sam:pson

Affirming.

George G. Fetter Company appeals from a judgment of $750.00 against it for personal injury to appellee, Coggeshall, Jr. Its only insistence in brief of counsel is that the instructions were erroneous in not requiring the jury to believe from the evidence, before finding for the plaintiff, that the failure of the defendant to exercise due care was the direct and proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. It cites in support of its contention the case of Ware v. Saufley, 194 Ky. 53.

The court in its instructions told the jury the several duties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. KlusmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. United Casket Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. GarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. W. M. Abbott Transfer Co. v. KruseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. State Highway Commission v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API