Legal Opinion

Hammen v. Baltimore County Police Department

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 2003No. 60, Sept. Term, 2002PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

This case concerns a request made by John E. Hammen, appellant, a retired police officer of the Baltimore County Police Department, pursuant to the Maryland Public Information Act (hereafter “MPIA”). The MPIA is codified in Maryland Code (1984,1999 Repl.Vol., 2001 Supp.), section 10-611 et seq. of the State Government Article.1

On May 15, 2001, appellant made a MPIA request to the Baltimore County Office of Law for certain surveillance video*443tapes taken of his activities. Appellant wanted access to the tapes to use in respect to the separate administrative proceedings related to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Coburn v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Attorney General v. Anne Arundel County School Bus Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Creveling v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. In re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Cottman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Arrington v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. In Re Kaela C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API