Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 8, 2007No. 10, 26, Sept. Term, 2007PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALAN M. WILNER,

Judge, Retired, Specially Assigned.

We have before us two more cases in which a trial court has searched for some effective way to enforce the legal obligation that parents have to support the children they bring into the world. 1 In Bryant v. Howard County Dept. of Social Services ex rel. Costley, 387 Md. 30, 33, 874 A.2d 457, 458 (2005), we acknowledged the difficulties and the frustration faced by the courts when dealing with parents who wilfully and defiantly refuse to comply with lawful, and often consensual, child support orders.

We recognized in Bryant, as we had in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Toler v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. IvyKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Office of the Public Defender v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. La Valle v. La ValleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API