Mini Spas, Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment Security
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-employer Mini Spas, Inc., appeals a decision of the Board of Review that its former employee is eligible for unemployment benefits. That determination of eligibility affirmed the ruling of the administrative law judge that the employer had failed to timely protest a determination of benefits by the Department of Employment Security. 1
The two issues on appeal, as framed by the employer, are: (1) whether the Department abused its discretion in refusing to consider the employer’s protest to the benefits awarded because the protest was not filed within ten days; and (2) whether the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Airkem Intermountain, Inc. v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Kirkwood v. Department of Employment Security, Board of Review, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Thiessens v. Department of Employment Security, Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Armstrong v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc. v. Utah State University Department of Agriculture & Applied ScienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.