Legal Opinion

Song v. Que

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 16, 2023No. 3:23-cv-02159Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIHUA SONG, Case No. 23-cv-02159-VC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. QUASH SERVICE AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WENBIN QUE, Re: Dkt. No. 28 Defendant. The motion to quash service is granted, and the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. This ruling assumes the reader is familiar with the facts, the applicable legal standard, and the arguments made by the parties. Service. Song has not established that Que was properly served under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Brockmeyer v. May,

383 F.3d 798, 801

(9…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Glencore Grain Rotterdam B v. V. Shivnath Rai Harnarain Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Lebel v. MaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Cerner Middle East Limited v. Icapital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API