Legal Opinion
Rautenstrauch v. Secretary of Defense
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided May 20, 1970No. Civ. A. No. SA70CA172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPEARS, Chief Judge.
In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner, a private in the United States Army Reserve, alleges that he is being unlawfully detained and deprived of his liberty, and that disapproval of his application for discharge as a conscientious objector has no basis in fact, is a denial of due process of law, is arbitrary and capricious, is based upon a misinterpretation and misapplication of the law, regulations, directives and evidence, and is illegal and in violation of Army Regulation 135-25 and Section 6(j) of Title I of the Military Selective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- John E. Bates v. Commander, First Coast Guard DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. St. ClairDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- P. F. C. Daniel E. Pitcher v. Melvin Laird, as Secretary of Defenses.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aquilino v. LairdDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1970
- George K. Ward v. John A. Volpe, as Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Sofranko v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Moore v. ConnellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Rastin v. LairdDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1970