Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Siewick v. Jamieson Science & Engineering, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 4, 2002No. CIV.A.920045-LFOPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
The Estate of Dr. John A. Jamieson (“the Estate”) moves to reconsider, or in the alternative, to alter or amend, the July 27, 2001 Order which denied its motion for summary judgment. The July 27 Order determined that the question of whether the Estate’s decedent was plaintiffs “employer” within the meaning of the wrongful termination provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C.A. § 3730(h), was not susceptible to resolution by summary judgment, but turned on an issue of fact to be decided by a trier of fact. The Estate invites attention to the recent decision…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Coramae Ella Gary v. James Edward LongCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Labadie Coal Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Yesudian Ex Rel. United States v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades Union v. George A. Kracher, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pencheng Si v. Laogai Research Foundation FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph T. Siewick v. Jamieson Science and Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Tac-Critical Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Facility Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. EmorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.