Legal Opinion

Burch v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 1934No. 25226PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes on to be heard upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the appeal. The ground assigned for dismissal is: No motion for new trial was filed and overruled by the trial court. Defendant in error contends there is no error presented to this court in the absence thereof.

The action was brought by Norman Y. Gibson, as plaintiff, against H. E. Burch and Lola Burch, plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to set aside a conveyance of land by H. E. Burch to his wife, Lola Burch. The action was tried on June 26, 1933, without a jury, before Honorable E. A. Summers, as district…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tyler v. TylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Malleck v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Federal Refining Co. v. Fortuna Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Lowenstein v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Sac & Fox Oil Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bistate Oil Co. v. Heston Oil Co. (In Re Heston Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Soulé v. Gragg (In re Harrison)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2013
  3. McCoy v. Braden Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mashburn v. GentryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  5. Opp v. BoggsMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API