Legal Opinion

Bay Casino, LLC. v. M/V ROYAL EMPRESS

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 11, 1998No. 98 CV 2333 (SJ)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Introduction

This matter is currently before the Court on Defendants’ application, pursuant to Rule E(4)(f) of. the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (“Supplemental Rules”), to vacate the arrest and attachment of the M/V ROYAL EMPRESS, and to allow Defendants to post a $200,000 bond instead. Defendants have also moved, this Court pursuant to Supplemental Rule E(7) to require Plaintiff to post 'a $1,069,000 bond as security for their proposed e'ounter- and cross-claims. On April 2, 1998, the Court conducted an evidentiary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. The Belcher Company of Alabama, Inc. v. M/v Maratha Mariner, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API