Legal Opinion

Matter of TCM

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1983No. 43191Published

1Opinion of the Court

651 S.W.2d 525 (1983)

In the Matter of T.C.M. and B.J.M., Petitioners-Respondents, and

J.M.M., Respondent-Appellant.

No. 43191.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

March 15, 1983.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied May 13, 1983.

Application to Transfer Denied June 30, 1983.

Murphy & Associates, P.C. by Edward E. Murphy, Jr., Clayton, for respondent-appellant.

Lashly, Caruthers, Thies, Rava & Hamel, P.C. by Rexford H. Caruthers, William E. Buckley and Amy Rehm Hinderer, St. Louis, for petitioners-respondents.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 13, 1983.

SATZ…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. Grissum v. ReesmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Domijan v. HarpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API