Legal Opinion

Pautz v. D.H.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2010No. 20100109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶1] E.H. (hereinafter “Eric,” a pseudonym) appeals a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to his child, D.H. (hereinafter “David,” a pseudonym). We hold the juvenile court’s findings that the conditions and causes of David’s deprivation are likely to continue, and David will probably suffer serious harm as a result, are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I..[12] Eric is David’s father. Eric was born in 1978. When Eric was nineteen years old, he dated T.H. (hereinafter “Tonya,” a pseudonym), for about six months. After Eric and Tonya separated, Tonya gave birth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of T.F. v. Director, Traill County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Boehmer v. T.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Reed v. C.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Knoll ex rel. Cass County Social Services v. D.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Interest of E.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interest of A.L.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Interest of R.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Larson v. S.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Interest of C.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re DHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API