Legal Opinion

Newman v. Rhebem Theatres Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff was not entitled to a foreclosure judgment as the lien was clearly one against the contractor both under the complaint and from the language of the hen. It was not filed as against the owner upon the theory that the latter was hable for materials furnished after the alleged new promise. There must be a new trial in order to determine what sum, if any, the plaintiff may be entitled to, based upon such materials as were furnished after the alleged new promise, and which may not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Voska, Foelsch & Sidlo, Inc. v. RulandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API