Gargone v. State

Presumably, the statement in note 1 of the majority opinion that “the prosecutor involved is no longer with the state attorney’s office” means that, since the case is being remanded for a new trial anyway, there is no useful purpose to be served in detailing the egregious behavior of the assistant state attorney prosecuting this case.

Perhaps the majority is correct. However, I think it will benefit other persons who are charged with the responsibility of representing the State of Florida in criminal proceedings to inform them that this trial was a clinic in the not-so-fine art of…