Legal Opinion

Molina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1983No. 82-870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

447 So.2d 253 (1983)

Raul MOLINA, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 82-870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 4, 1983.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and William P. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

NESBITT, Judge.

In the first appearance of this case, we reversed the defendant's conviction because the investigating officers stated that after interviewing two non-testifying co-defendants they arrested…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pearson; Concurrence · Schwartz.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Postell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Johnnides v. Amoco Oil Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Clausell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Carlton Harris, 079919 v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Steward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API