Minato v. Ferrare
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff Minato was standing in the middle of a road when he was hit by defendant Ferrare’s car. The issues presented by this case are whether the worker in the road doctrine is accepted in Oregon, and if a worker in the road is a pedestrian. We hold that the doctrine is no longer necessary and reverse the Court of Appeals.
The facts in this case are not in dispute. Minato worked on a private survey crew. At the time of the accident his job required him to hold a plumb bob over the centerline of the highway so that the surveyor in a nearby field could sight into the bob to find a section…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Bradley v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- McCarty v. HEDGESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Graves v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeYoung v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Stites v. DUIT CONST. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- DeYoung v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990