Legal Opinion

Minato v. Ferrare

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1983No. TC 79-472-L, CA A21705, SC 29103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff Minato was standing in the middle of a road when he was hit by defendant Ferrare’s car. The issues presented by this case are whether the worker in the road doctrine is accepted in Oregon, and if a worker in the road is a pedestrian. We hold that the doctrine is no longer necessary and reverse the Court of Appeals.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Minato worked on a private survey crew. At the time of the accident his job required him to hold a plumb bob over the centerline of the highway so that the surveyor in a nearby field could sight into the bob to find a section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bradley v. MaurerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. McCarty v. HEDGESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Graves v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Stites v. DUIT CONST. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. DeYoung v. FallonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API