Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1993No. 14291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

After a consolidated jury trial, Defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy and attempt to commit a felony, fraud. The issue before us is whether the evidence of the out-of-court identification and in-court identifications of Defendants, as well as the evidence of Defendants’ association, were the tainted result of an illegal stop and therefore inadmissible at trial. Because we hold that the trial court incorrectly applied the “probable cause” standard in determining the stop was illegal, we remand for a redetermination of whether the police officers’ stop of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McNealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. BrusuelasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. BrusuelasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API