Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. E & E Automotive & Tire Service, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 2010No. S-13609PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In March 2005 Timothy Lindsey was severely injured when his employer's unattended truck rolled backwards and struck him. An inspection revealed that the cause of the accident was a non-functioning parking brake. Lindsey sued E & E Automotive & Tire Service Inc., the repair shop that had recently serviced the truck, for negligence. E & E had been asked to repair the parking brake but was unable to do so. E & E informed Lindsey's employer that it had not repaired the parking brake and that the parking brake still did not work. The superior court granted…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Delbrel v. Doenges Bros. Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Devine v. Great Divide Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Howell v. Municipality of AnchorageDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
- Sage v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021