Legal Opinion

Roe v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20160179PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tufte, Justice.

[¶ 1] Barry Roe appeals a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief in which he alleged he received ineffective assistance of counsel from two attorneys who represented him at different stages of his criminal case. We affirm, concluding Roe was not prejudiced by his counsels’ representation.

I

[¶ 2] The State charged Roe with two counts of gross sexual imposition. The State’s evidence included forensic interview statements by three children, two of whom alleged sexual abuse by Roe. During the preliminary hearing, a detective testified to what the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Adams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kalmio v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Truelove v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Edwardson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Blackcloud v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Kalmio v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API