Muskat v. Sternberg
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
This is an interlocutory appeal by permission pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308). Defendants appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action with prejudice, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 103(b) (87 Ill. 2d R. 103(b)), for failure to exercise reasonable diligence in obtaining service of process after the expiration of the applicable period of limitations. We reverse.
Plaintiff Sylvia Muskat’s alleged injury took place between July 23 and July 26, 1980, when she underwent surgery for cataract removal and had a corrective lens implanted in her eye. She filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- O'CONNELL v. St. Francis HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Stamos v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Morton Grove Park District v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Aranda v. Hobart Manufacturing Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muskat v. SternbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Semersky v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Muskat v. SternbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Walicek v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Martinez v. EricksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987