Legal Opinion

Muskat v. Sternberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1991No. 1-89-0327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Sylvia Muskat appeals from the trial court’s order that dismissed her complaint with prejudice against Dr. Paul Sternberg and his professional corporation Paul Sternberg, M.D. S.C. (collectively referred to as the defendants) under Supreme Court Rule 103(b) (107 Ill. 2d R. 103(b)) for her failure to exercise reasonable diligence to obtain service of summons prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. Muskat contends that the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing her action with prejudice. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Between July 23 and July 26,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. O'CONNELL v. St. Francis HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Catlett v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Muskat v. SternbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Daily v. HartleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Serafin v. SeithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Cannon v. DiniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Parker v. PiskurAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API