Legal Opinion
Anastasia Realty Co. v. Lai
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 15, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1013OPINION OF THE COURT
Carl O. Callender, J.
I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE
After the petitioner rested, the respondents moved to dismiss because the three-day demand notice contained no signature. The petitioner was given until August 4, 1997 to submit papers, and the respondents had until August 11, 1997. Neither party submitted papers timely. The respondents submitted their papers late; the petitioner never submitted any papers.
The demand in question contained a line for a signature, but that line was blank. After that line was the name of a law firm containing the last names of five partners of the law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Ellivkroy Realty Corp. v. HDP 86 Sponsor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fannie Mae v. LindoNassau County District Court · 1998