Legal Opinion
Fannie Mae v. Lindo
Nassau County District Court
Decided August 17, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joel B. Gewanter, J.
Respondent moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss *1004this holdover, postforeclosure summary proceeding on the sole ground that the 10-day notice to quit is “defective”. No issue has been raised regarding service thereof, which was apparently made in due fashion; however, respondent claims that: (a) she was/is confused by the use of “Fannie Mae” as the name of the petitioner, rather than “Federal National Mortgage Association”; and (b) that the law firm now representing the petitioner and which signed the said notice was/is not known to her, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Yui Woon Kwong v. Sun Po EngAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Anastasia Realty Co. v. LaiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arcadia Management, Inc. v. SchillanNew York District Court · 2009