Legal Opinion

Burdine v. Burdine

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1952No. 34891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

In this opinion the parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff in error was defendant.

Plaintiff filed her petition in this divorce action, alleging that she and defendant entered into a verbal agreement to become husband and wife, and that such agreement was consummated by cohabitation and mutual assumption of marital duties and obligations, and that such relations were maintained by the parties in good faith; that they held themselves out to the public as man and wife and were so recognized in the community by their relatives, friends and associates. It was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Teter v. TeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Poole v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Mantz v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Whitney v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. William Gene EatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  2. McKee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Earley v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Matter of Estate of RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Dowell v. WelchCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API