Legal Opinion

Dominiack Mechanical, Inc. v. Dunbar

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2001No. 71A03-0012-CV-455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellants, Dominiack Mechanical, Inc. and Jerry Dominiack (collectively "Domi-niack"), challenge the trial court's dismissal of Count II of their second amended complaint against appellees Becea Dalton, Ryan Gee, and Rich Kiger.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

On January 17, 2000, Dominiack filed a second amended complaint against the ap-pellees. Count II of this complaint reads as follows:

"For their complaint against the Defendants ... Becea Dalton, Ryan Gee, [and] Rich Kizer ... the Plaintiffs say:

1. In January, 1998, Kimberly Dunbar organized a trip to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Kopis v. SavageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BloomBank v. United Fidelity Bank F.S.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Carr v. PearmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Mikel v. JohnstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Town of Chandler v. Indiana-American Water Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Jo. W. v. Je. W.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API