Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Pikur Enterprises, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 1991No. 1744 C.D. 1989 and 860 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.
This consolidated appeal arises out of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation’s (DOT) condemnation of real property at East Ohio Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
On January 3, 1985, DOT filed a declaration of taking in fee simple of, inter alia, the real property of Pikur Enterprises, Inc. (Pikur) at 912-914 East Ohio Street.
On March 8, 1985, Pikur filed a petition for the appointment of a Board of Viewers (Viewers) alleging, inter alia, that the condemned real property at 912-914 East Ohio Street was used by Pikur “for a unified purpose”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Witney v. Lebanon CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Daly v. Darby Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Tinicum Real Estate Holding Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Stoner v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lerro v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Township of Millcreek v. A. Cres Trust of June 25, 1998Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Grosso v. LoveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Stover v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Cruz v. Wanamaker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bradford County1993
- Freeman v. Tagliaferri, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.