Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Just

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2002No. 28105PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment ordering the trustee under a deed of trust to execute and deliver a trustee’s deed to the highest bidder at the foreclosure sale. Prior to the sale, the grantor and beneficiary had entered into an agreement resolving the default. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the district court because the sale was void and the trustee cannot be required to execute and deliver a trust deed.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In April 1998, Ronald and Terilyn Rush executed a deed of trust on their residence to secure payment of a promissory note in the sum…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Quiring v. QuiringIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Taylor v. BrowningIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Allen v. AyerOregon Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lexington Heights Development, LLC v. CrandlemireIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. PHH Mortgage Services Corp. v. PerreiraIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Lee v. HSBC BANK USAHawaii Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API