Legal Opinion

Lee v. HSBC BANK USA

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2009No. 29744PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

DUFFY, J.

The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (District Court) certified the following question of law to the Hawaii Supreme Court:

Where a mortgagor cures its default prior to a foreclosure proceeding pursuant to [Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) ] § 667-5, but an auction inadvertently goes forward, is a valid agreement created entitling the high bidder at the auction to lost profits?

Based on the analysis below, we hold that a valid agreement is not created in such a situation and that the high bidder is entitled only to a return of his or her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Moeller v. Chun-Yen LienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Francis v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Aames Funding Corp. v. MoresHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kekauoha-Alisa v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Kekauoha-Alisa)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Santiago v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rundgren v. Washington Mutual Bank, FACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Matsuyoshi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API