Legal Opinion
Alfred OCHOA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1973No. 72-1651PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
In this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Alfred Ochoa challenges the hiring policies 1 at Monsanto’s recently opened Chocolate Bayou Plant near Alvin, Texas as being discriminatory toward himself and Mexican-Americans generally. 2 At the conclusion of the evidence the District Court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law exonerating Monsanto. Ochoa v. Monsanto Co., S.D.Tex., 1971, 335 F. Supp. 53. Reading this opinion through the protective lenses of F.R.Civ.P. 52(a) we find the result acceptable and accordingly, affirm.
Ochoa complains that the District Judge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jake ROWE Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Texas Education Agency (Austin Independent School District)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Jose Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Ochoa v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- 13 Fair empl.prac.cas. 604, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,177 Louis Swint v. Pullman-Standard, Clyde Humphrey, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- James S. CAREY, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. GREYHOUND BUS CO., INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Lansdowne Swim ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Frank WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TALLAHASSEE MOTORS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.