Legal Opinion

Dunn v. City of Scranton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1924No. Appeals, 8 and 9Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam,

These appeals are from judgments in actions to recover for injuries to one of appellees by a fall on a sidewalk, which the verdict establishes was negligently maintained by the city. Appellant’s brief states the single question for review, in three forms, which, in substance, is whether the record shows notice to the city of the defect. Pursuant to Rule 50, we confine our consideration of the record to that point, (Garvey v. Thompson, 268 Pa. 353, 355; Kasson v. Water Co., 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 11, 15); the supplemental statement of question involved, filed in the supplemental brief,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Garvey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Kasson v. Rocky Glen Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API