Legal Opinion

Garvey v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1920No. Appeal, No. 91PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 91, Oct. T., 1920, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. Westmoreland Co., May T., 1918, No. 292, on verdict for defendant, in case of I. V. Garvey v. Elizabeth Thompson. Ejectment for land in Burrell Township. Before Copeland, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were various ridings and instructions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschzisker,

This is an action of ejectment in which judgment was entered on a verdict for defendant; plaintiff has appealed.

Both parties claim a good record title, and defendant also alleges title by adverse possession.

*355The record title, which involved no controverted questions of fact, was for the court, and the trial judge instructed thereon in favor of defendant; but, at the same time, he submitted the case to the jury for a special verdict on the issue of adverse possession, set up by defendant and denied by plaintiff.

The jury found against plaintiff generally, and,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keck v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Etnier v. PascoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Hanlon v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. McKinley v. WainsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Clapp v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API