Legal Opinion
Bach v. Teton County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2006No. 04-36061PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
John Bach, a former practicing lawyer, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-64, California statutory law, and Idaho statutory and common law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, see Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2001), and its dismissal for failure to state a claim. See Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 893 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.
The district court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donald H. Albrecht, and Joanne Albrecht v. William S. LundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Ernest J. Franceschi, Jr., Esq. v. Kenneth Schwartz, Commissioner of South Orange County Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Morrison v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Delta Savings Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bryfogle v. LivingstonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Buelna v. DannelsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Cadence Bank v. Heritage Family Offices LLPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Campbell v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Gila River Indian Community v. 99 Ranch LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.