American Disappearing Bed Co. v. Arnaelsteen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit- Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Southern District of California. Action by the American Disappearing Bed Company against Edward Arnaelsteen. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The court below sustained a demurrer to a complaint in an action at law brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to recover damages for the infringement of letters patent No. 839,996, granted to Lawrence Holmes on January 1, 1907, for “apartment house with disappearing bed.” There are 13 claims in the patent; but, when analyzed, the essential features of the invention are the construction of adjacent rooms in an apartment house in such a way that in one of the rooms, by the use of a double floor, a recess is created, into which a bed from the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Fond Du Lac County v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Crier v. InnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- Jacobs v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Milligan & Higgins Glue Co. v. UptonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Turner v. Quincy Market Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1912
- Aiken v. Riter & Conley Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.