Legal Opinion

Crier v. Innes

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 16, 1909No. 69PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Vermont.

1Opinion of the Court

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

'This is a suit in equity charging the infringement of design patent No. 27,115 issued May 25,1897, to William H. Young for a design for a sarcophagus monument, and claiming an injunction and damages. Assuming that the patent is valid, infringement is obvious. Consequently the question of validity is the one of primary importance.

The defendants first contend that the patent is invalid for want of invention. But, in considering this contention, we are met at the outset with a decree of the Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York holding in a contested case…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  3. International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  4. Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
  5. Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API