Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Lazarus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated July 12, 1982, as denied their motions for summary judgment on the ground that the defendants Lazarus, Rosmarin and Kanov, doing business as Merge Co., are absolutely liable under section 240 of the Labor Law. Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable by defendants-respondents, and motions for summary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Rea v. Albert Elia Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Pereira v. A. D. Herman Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Harvel v. City of Johnston CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. La Lima v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Antunes v. 950 Park Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Congregation B'nai IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API