United States v. 162.20 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Clay County, State of Mississippi, and F. E. Uithoven
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
We are squarely confronted with an issue of law which this court has never addressed: is alleged noncompliance by federal authorities with the mandate of Section 470f of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, [NHPA], 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq., a legally sufficient defense to the condemnation of private property for use in a federal project under the Declaration of Taking Act, [DOTA], 40 U.S.C. § 258a? Our answer depends upon a resolution of the tension between the vast discretionary condemnation power given the government under DOTA, and the pervasive reach of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jerry Maiatico and Matomic Operating Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents & Associates, Inc. v. Colonel Lloyd Kent Brown, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Coliseum Square Ass'n v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- National Trust for Historic Preservation v. BlanckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990
- United States v. 0.95 Acres of Land, United States of America v. 12.84 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.