Legal Opinion

Richardson v. . Wicker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1879PublishedCited by 8 opinions

MotioN to amerce the defendant sheriff heard at Fall Term, 1878, of Moore Superior Court, before Buxton, J. The facts appear in the opinion. His Honor refused the motion and the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDillard, J.

This was a sci. fa. to show cause against a judgment nisi for $100 against the defendant as sheriff of Moore county for failing to have in court at fall term, 1878, the amount of an execution issued in the case of the plaintiff' against AlexT McNeill, Arch’d D. Blue and W. C. Tliaggard for the collection of a debt contracted before the war. The ■defendant sheriff showed for cause against the making of the judgment absolute, that the defendants, had no property, real or personal, in excess of the exemptions allowed them by the laws of the state and the decisions of the courts, and that lie had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Badham v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Washington Toll Bridge Co. v. Commissioners of BeaufortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. McCanless v. . FlinchumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Christian v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1934
  4. BROGDEN PRODUCE COMPANY v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Christian v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API