Legal Opinion
Vinick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 8, 2000No. 98-2143PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Arnold W. Vinick appeals the district court’s determination that he personally is liable for withholding taxes that Jefferson Bronze, Inc. (“Jefferson Bronze”) failed to pay. Previously this court vacated a determination that Vinick was a “responsible person” within the meaning of section 6672(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion. See Vinick v. C.I.R., 110 F.3d 168 (1st Cir.1997) (appeal from summary judgment in the government’s favor) (hereinafter Vinick I). Following a bench trial, the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Fisher v. Kadant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Erwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Northeast Drilling, Inc. v. Inner Space Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. 15 Bosworth StreetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.