Kimble v. State

In this direct appeal the appellant challenges the sentences imposed after the trial court granted a rule 3.800(b) motion to correct scoresheet error and resen-tenced him. We deny the appellant’s double jeopardy claim and, with the exception discussed below, we affirm the judgment and sentences without further discussion. However, because the appellant’s sentences were originally all running concurrently to each other, the appellant was entitled to credit on each count for the time he spent in jail or prison after the original sentence was imposed but before he was resentenced to consecutive…