Legal Opinion

Harry Von Tilzer Music Publishing Co. v. Leo Feist, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiffs to continue its examination before trial of defendant Leo Feist, Inc., by its officers Abe Olman, Vice President, and Harry Link, General Professional Manager, and to stay the examination before trial sought to be taken by defendants of Harry Von Tilzer and the deposition of William Teller, Sr., until plaintiffs’ depositions of defendant have been completed.

It appears that plaintiffs’ notice of taking depositions of defendant Leo Feist, Inc., named Jack Robbins as the officer to be examined, but by arrangement of the attorneys Abe Olman…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pavlou v. Ocean Traders Marine CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1958
  3. Hillside Amusement Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Fox v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API