Legal Opinion

Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided October 29, 1958No. A-14484PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCARREY, District Judge.

This is an anti-trust suit and comes before the court upon a motion made by the plaintiff to require the defendant Al Shyman, Inc., to pay costs and to strike the answer of defendant Al Shyman, Inc., for the reason that one Al Shyman failed to appear at the noticed time for the taking of the deposition. Although named as one of the defendants in the case, the defendant Al Shyman was not served; however, counsel did appear for him in the early stages of the case, but the Court is now advised by other counsel that counsel appearing for Al Shy-man earlier was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harry Von Tilzer Music Publishing Co. v. Leo Feist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. El Salto, S.A. v. PSG Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Doe v. HersemannDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  4. Scott v. LiuHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Harry H. Foiles v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Alphonse T. Indrelunas, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API