Kroener v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Tama District Court. — Hon. L. G. Kinne, Judge. Action for personal injury. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
The plaintiff was a brakeman in the employ of the defendant company. On the twentieth day of May, 1890, .and for some time before, his work was on a freight car. On that day he ran into the station of Yan Horn about noon, and in the evening he was set at work in the yard with a switching crew, which, besides the engineer and fireman, consisted of three men. It was the duty of one to pull the pins to cut the train or detach the cars to be shoved or “kicked” by the engine onto a track, -as desired; another was to “throw the switches;” and the third, which was the plaintiff on the night in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitsett v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Collins v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Mathews v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Funston v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Belair v. C. & N. W. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Maloney v. Winston Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Elings v. Ted McGrevey, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Bradbury v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Sankey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.