Legal Opinion

Keller v. Tavarone

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2003No. S-01-1052PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

NATURE OF CASE

Appellant, Brenda L. Keller, filed a medical malpractice petition against appellee, Thomas N. Tavarone, M.D., under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (Tort Claims Act), expressly relying on the “savings clause” of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-919(2) (Reissue 1997). The district court found the savings clause inapplicable and dismissed the action. We removed the appeal to our docket on our own motion pursuant to our authority to regulate the caseloads of this court and the Nebraska Court of Appeals. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Reissue 1995). As explained below, we affirm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Omaha Public Power District v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Campbell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Keller v. TavaroneNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ways v. ShivelyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Geddes v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Patterson v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Jessen v. MalhotraNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Foster v. BryanLGH Medical Center EastNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API