Legal Opinion

Ledbetter v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1929No. 7276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Heretofore we dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction, holding that appellants failed to comply with article 2266, R. S. 1925, in that they made proof of their inability to pay costs of appeal “before the court trying the case” after the adjournment of the term at which the case was tried. In this we followed the general language used in the cases of Wooldridge v. Roller, 52 Tex. 452; Hearne v. Prendergast, 61 Tex. 627; Graves v. Horn, 89 Tex. 77, 33 S. W. 332; Harris v. Davis, Agent (Tex. Civ. App.) 267' S. W. 1045, and other eases which hold in general terms that proof of inability to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graves v. HornTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith v. Buffalo Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Wooldridge v. RollerTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Railway Co. v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Hearne v. PrendergastTexas Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McRoy v. Riverlake Country Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Highlands Underwriters Insurance Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Canyon Credit Union v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Casstevens v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Day v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API