Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 27, 1926No. 3653-3655PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). For the packers it is urged: That the district court was without jurisdiction; that to compel compliance with the demand would be violative of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution; that manufacturing is not interstate commerce; that in no event has the Secretary any jurisdiction over the manufacturing part of packers’ business, or of books and accounts and other papers relating thereto.
Jurisdiction of federal. courts to entertain original actions for mandamus may be conferred only by statute clearly granting it. Section 402 of the Packers and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. McReynolds v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- State v. AddingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Bowles v. ChewDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- Petrowski v. NuttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. WoerthDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.