Carr v. Spannagel
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. There must be an order •of court revoking the appointment of a female guardian; though she marry after her appointment, this will not of itself work a revocation. — 1 Williams on Ex. 488, 449; Post v. Ooult, 3 Mo. 36. The judgment of the Probate •Court could not be attacked collaterally. — Qraignon v. Astor, 2 How. 319 ; Voorhies v. Banle, 10 Pet. 449 ; Philadelphia, etc., R. Qo. v. Stimpson, 14 Pet. 448 ; Codee v. Halsey, 16 Pet. 87.
1Opinion of the CourtBaKEwell, J.
This is an action of ejectment, brought by the plaintiffs, who are minors, for certain real estate described in the petition. It was admitted on the trial that Henry GJ-. Pas-challisthe curator of plaintiffs, who are the sole heirs and legal representatives of Walter B. Carr, deceased; and that Walter B. Carr died before March, 1871, seized of the lot described, of which defendant is in possession. The damages were shown to be 1 cent for detention of the property, and the monthly rents 1 cent. Plaintiff then rested. During the further progress of the trial, evidence was introduced tending to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- State ex rel. Rucker v. RuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Strouse v. DrennanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Overton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
- Rugle v. WebsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.